The aircraft
MiG-17, MiG-21 and MiG-23
CONSTANT PEG’s three principal MiG families presented very different problems. Together they taught American aircrew that silhouette, speed and reputation revealed far less than seeing the aircraft flown to its strengths.
MiG-17 ‘Fresco’: the turning fighter
The subsonic MiG-17 could appear obsolete beside newer American fighters, yet it was small, difficult to see and extremely agile. Pilots who accepted a slow turning fight on its terms discovered how quickly technological superiority could be squandered.

MiG-21 ‘Fishbed’: small, fast and elusive
The MiG-21 combined supersonic performance with a tiny visual and radar signature. Earlier HAVE DOUGHNUT and HAVE IDEA work built the foundation; in Red Eagle service it became central to teaching visual acquisition, energy management and disciplined missile employment.
“In the hands of a good pilot, versus the F-4, the MiG-21 wins every time.”
Capt Robert ‘Catfish’ Sheffield, USAF · Bandit 16

MiG-23 ‘Flogger’: power with sharp edges
The swing-wing MiG-23 brought speed, acceleration and a more demanding operating environment. Acquired aircraft arrived without a normal support system, and the Red Eagles had to understand both formidable performance and unforgiving handling characteristics.
“The Flogger was like a graduation present for having mastered the MiG-21, although none of us wanted to fly it!”
Maj Leonard J. Bucko, USMC · Bandit 22

Knowledge earned in the cockpit
The squadron was not preserving museum pieces. It was producing practical combat knowledge: where each aircraft was strongest, how it presented in the air and which mistakes gave it an advantage. Those lessons were passed directly to frontline crews.